演講公告
講題:人類學啟發的數位世界研究
講者:彭松嶽 (陽明大學科技與社會研究所助理教授)
時間:2020/12/16(Wed)15:00 – 17:00
地點:清華人社院C304
主辦單位:國立清華大學人類學研究所
演講摘要:
數位科技與數據分析在日常生活中已無所不在,且成為構成生活世界的一部分,但我們能以何種方式對此轉變中的世界進行理解?此次的分享將探索受人類學啟發之理解與研究數位生活世界的方式,並藉由過去與進行中之數位科技和數據分析相關研究進行討論。
講題:風土與文化資產經濟:臺、法比較研究
講者:楊豐銘 (法國高等社科院社會學博士)
時間:2020/11/18(Wed)15:00 – 17:00
地點:清華人社院C304
主辦單位:國立清華大學人類學研究所
Terroir是一個來自法語的詞彙,它源於拉丁文territorium一字,原指城市中可耕作的地區,後用來指涉一套文化價值系統,試著將土地與氣候、人與物、生產者與消費者連結在一起。「風土」的概念不只應用在農產品的獨特性,也往往被運用於關於食品安全的觀念上,類似我們常使用的「食品履歷」或「農產溯源」等概念,與土地及土地上的生產者連結,成為讓消費者安心、建立信任關係的一種方式,這也是農產品價值的主要來源之一。近年來在臺灣,從農產品牌的塑造到地方特色的宣傳,無處不見攸關風土的描繪陳述。
我沿用三個法國學者的觀點,來分析風土與所延伸出來的文化資產等概念,分別是人類學者Marion Demossier將風土的核心邏輯定義為「擁有差別的權力」(le droit d’être différent),社會學者Lucien Karpik的「獨特經濟」 (économie des singularités),還有歷史學者Stéphane Le Bras的「小產區」(petits vignobles) 等理論脈絡,探討這些概念如何作為小產區抗衡大規模工業化生產的概念工具,如何系統性地形塑文化資產,及與這二者相關的各項爭議。我也將探討後公賣局時代甫開放民間經營不久的臺灣酒文化,思考本土葡萄酒業者在脫離國家掌控表現的獨特性與其風土概念之建構。藉由臺製葡萄酒的案例,我們將一起思索小農產品(或產區)作為詮釋國族主義(釀自己的酒)和跨國主義(出國比賽得獎)之間的碰撞和擠壓出來的主體經驗。
講題:藝術x考古的奇想和關係
講者:藝術家涂維政(國立臺北藝術大學美術學系助理教授)
時間:2020/10/14(Wed)15:00 – 17:00(結束後會有Happy Hour)
地點:清華人社院C304
主辦單位:國立清華大學人類學研究所
演講簡介:
藝術家涂維政自2000年開始創作「卜湳文明遺跡」以來,經常使用考古遺跡的形式來作為創作的呈現,其他創作也和人類學或博物館學有些關係。在作品中往往一手包辦了藝術生產、策展、行銷者等角色,學術、商品與媒體總動員;龐大的作品計畫中不盡合理的混合我們對文明遺跡、傳統文物、傳統藝術與當代藝術展陳方式的刻板經驗與記憶。
將「自我」異變成「體制」,作品仿擬考古知識系統、美術館或博物館的機制的操作,企圖建構新聖像及新的神話系統,將歷史、傳說、現象、物件與不同文明的特有形制相互拼貼,產生時間與空間錯置的謬誤感,一方面指涉所理解的當下或未來的文明狀態;另一方面呼應台灣的多元文化及普遍存在文化主體認同的歧異。在作品中包覆交融當代現象,與人、事、時、地、物各種關係的建立和縫合,創造話題與事件性,關注參與式藝術的創作面向同時觀照身體勞動、手工技藝與物質性的呈現,是將「關係美學式」的創作行為具體推向「自我體制化」的形式展演。其中將分享2016受邀英國卡斯雕塑基金會、2017英國維多利亞與亞伯特博物館V&A Museum,2018受邀第一屆泰國雙年展並永久典藏,2019受邀荷蘭國家博物館個展……的作品。
演講也將分享一路走來的創作歷程,也將介紹「聖堂回想–和平島遺址展示與藝術教育推廣活動」籌辦過程,以及與清大考古團隊合作的美好經驗。
講題:在小島上探索大歷史:和平島考古
講者:臧振華(清華大學侯金堆特聘研究講座兼人類所所長)
時間:2020/10/07(Wed)15:00 – 17:00
地點:清華人社院C304
主辦單位:國立清華大學人類學研究所
演講簡介:我從來就不喜歡和平島,過去每次去到那裡,總是被狹窄的活動空間,雜亂無章的街道建築,壓迫得意興闌珊。 但是在我考古生涯的最後階段, 卻因緣際會地來到和平島。五、六個寒暑的考古,讓我對這個小島的過往雲煙產生了敬意和想像,以至於希望從湮滅的考古遺跡中,重現它過往的歷史場景、增添一些文化的氣息。
講題:福壽螺來台源流考:一段跨物種技術網絡史
講者:蔡晏霖(國立交通大學人文社會學系副教授)
地點:清華大學人社院C304
講題:尪仔:一個台灣投射人性的方式(Ang-a: A Taiwanese Mode of Animation)
講者:司黛蕊 Teri Silvio(中研院民族所副研究員)
地點:清華人社院C304
時間:2020/03/11 Wed. 15:00-17:00(結束後會有Happy Hour)
主辦單位:國立清華大學人類學研究所
演講簡介:本演講介紹我新書, Puppets, Gods, and Brands: Theorizing the Age of Animation from Taiwan, 的一個論點。 本書探討人們如何把自身的行動力與個性投射至外在的物質或虛擬環境,賦予非人類的東西他自己的生命力、靈魂等人類特色。透過在台灣十五年來的田野調研發展出一個新的人類學概念, 人性的投射(animation)。 連在同一個文化, 人性投射的方式會多元; 什麼樣的東西適合給予行動力? 人類的什麼特色能夠被投射到物質世界? 投射的過程如何? 在不同文化或次文化, 不同時代, 這些問題的回答會有差別。 在台灣漢人文化裡, 最傳統統投射人性的對象就是[尪仔]或[偶]。 這個範疇包含木偶, 神像, 公仔, 等擬人化的物品。 本演講要探討尪仔的特色和行動力的來源為了了解台灣漢人對人性的概念。
This talk will introduce part of my book, Puppets, Gods, and Brands, which attempts to outline an anthropological theory of animation, which I define as the process of projecting qualities perceived as human outside of the self and into the environment. My hope is that animation might serve as a complement to “performance,” a conceptual platform which allows us to compare practices across different social fields, different cultures, and different historical eras . Here I posit a Han Chinese/Taiwanese mode of animation which centers on a specific type of object, called ang-a in Holo or ou in Mandarin — a small, three-dimensional, human-form (or anthropomorphized animal or object-form) figure. The ang-a is invested with specific human qualities – personality, affect, and charisma — through specific types of actions – ritual, iconographic, and communicational practices. Examining the qualities of the ang-a and the sources of its agency can help us understand how Han Taiwanese people see the nature of humanity and what divides the human from the non-human.
講題:”You have to trust them”: Countervailing Relational Tendencies among Chinese Migrants in Tanzania
講者:Derek Sheridan(中研院民族所助研究員)
地點:清華人社院C304
時間:2020/03/04 Wed. 15:00-17:00
主辦單位:國立清華大學人類學研究所
Bio:
Derek Sheridan is an Assistant Research Fellow with the Institute of Ethnology at Academia Sinica. His research interests include China-Africa connections, migration and transnationalism, ethics, inequality, political economy, race, semiotics, knowledge production, global imaginaries, (global) China, and East Africa (Tanzania). His first project, the Mutualities of Being Chinese in Tanzania, is based on seventeen months of ethnographic fieldwork studying the everyday lives of migrant Chinese entrepreneurs in Tanzania. The book will examine how Chinese expatriates and ordinary Tanzanians negotiate a “South-South relationship” through the interpersonal ethics of social interactions. His next project concerns the circulation of martial arts culture between East Asia and Africa, and its influence on subjectivities and cultural production (incl. film) in Tanzania.
演講簡介:
Chinese migrants in Africa often demonstrate a paradoxical orientation to the social relationships they develop with locals. Many seek relationships and friendships which are necessary for facilitating business transactions and capital accumulation, but many also avoid or minimize relationships and friendships in order to protect themselves and others from varied perceived dangers. Even migrants who pursue friendships for affective purposes may face discouragement from their associated businesses/institutions. This is despite a recognition that “people-to-people” relations are important for the China-Africa relationship. These countervailing tendencies complicate any attempt to categorize everyday Chinese-African interactions as either cooperative or conflictual, integrated or segregated, or even instrumental and affective. Instead, these tendencies suggest the need to problematize the concept of relationality as applied to both critical theories of political economy and ethnographic approaches to ordinary ethics. This question is particularly relevant in Tanzania, where the narrative of Sino-African friendship as an anti-imperial cooperation and alternative model of global relationships was perhaps most visibly conceptualized, but which has since been reimagined to describe new modes of trade and investment more similar to global capitalism. Based on seventeen months of ethnographic fieldwork among Chinese migrant entrepreneurs, managers, and employees in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania between 2013 and 2016, I examine and compare three situations involving countervailing tendencies to both establish and limit relationships. Comparing these situations demonstrates both structural imperatives to relate in order to accomplish transactions, and the limits on relationships due to the vulnerabilities of interdependency and uneven wealth. Considering these countervailing tendencies in terms of theories of capitalism as either binding or separating, I examine implications for ethical/political assumptions about the sometimes-claimed distinctive character of South-South commerce.